The Man who Made Facebook

So Mark Zuckerberg, the developer of Facebook, has been called Time Magazine's Individual of the Year. That is fantastic as well as definitely not unjust, yet there is one thing in the media coverage that I simply can't resist talking about. A great deal of individuals say as well as compose that Mark Zuckerberg designed Facebook. I do not think that that is true.

Do not worry, I'm not going to rotate any conspiracy theory concepts regarding how Facebook remained in reality developed by aliens or Freemasons or whoever in a bid for world supremacy. My disagreement is harmlessly linguistic. To say that Zuckerberg (or any individual, for that issue) designed the Facebook social-networking site is like claiming that someone invented the Osram light-bulb or the Nokia telephone. Nobody invented those points. Edison designed the light-bulb, Bell created the telephone, and after that other individuals came along as well as improved on those creations as well as developed the well-known items referred to as Osram and Nokia.

The Man Who Made Facebook

Similarly, Zuckerberg, for all his wizard, did not develop the generic concept of a social-networking site. That innovation had currently been made; there were various other such sites available before Facebook occurred, the likes of Friendster, MySpace and Bebo. What Zuckerberg did was improve as well as broaden the idea, as well as his efforts were what finally tipped the balance and also brought the initial invention to the area where it is currently-- which is anywhere.

My point is this: you do not design specific well-known products. That's not just how people usually utilize the verb to invent. As I make sure you can see on your own from my examples concerning light-bulbs and telephones, it feels strange to say that a person created Osram or Nokia. To talk lexicologically, the verb to develop does not have certain top quality items in its selectional preference. It only has a selectional choice for common suggestions, for models. But what frustrates me is this: if individuals don't usually claim that a person invented Osram or Nokia, why does everyone keep claiming that Zuckerberg developed Facebook? Even Time itself, in the "Individual of the Year" concern, includes this junction two times. It is frequent enough in common parlance, as well: just google it.

Perhaps the reason is that, since social-networking sites are such a new sensation, people are failing to appreciate the difference in between the common concept (the "innovation", if you will) and also the specific execution (Facebook itself). For many people, Facebook was the first time they ever involved with online social networking, and so in their minds, the development and also the execution are merged, coextensive. One more possible description is that individuals think so extremely of the improvement Zuckerberg made to the initial suggestion that, in their opinion, it constitutes a different creation in its very own right: when individuals say "Zuckerberg created Facebook" they actually indicate something along the lines of "Zuckerberg developed a new kind of social-networking websites, of which Facebook is the very first (and so far just) execution". And yet another prospect for a description is that people suggest it not literally but as an aggrandizing, commemorative exaggeration-- a bit like claiming that a king built a castle or that a general won a battle.

Either way, I assume it's an intriguing psycholinguistic monitoring: an anomaly in people's use of one certain verb (to create) relative to one specific object (Facebook) exposes a deeper confusion in individuals's understanding of what exactly this "Facebook thing" is, where it came from and also what its importance is.

Tweet